How Executive Agreements Differ
Executive employment agreements share the same foundational elements as standard employment agreements — compensation, duties, termination, and restrictive covenants. But the stakes are higher, the terms are more complex, and the negotiation is more intense.
Executives bring significant leverage to the negotiation table. They are being asked to take on substantial responsibility, often leave secure positions, and may relocate their families. In return, they expect comprehensive protections and competitive compensation packages.
Key Provisions in Executive Agreements
Title, Duties, and Reporting Structure
An executive's title and reporting line carry significant weight. The agreement should specify:
- The executive's title (CEO, CFO, VP of Engineering, etc.)
- Who the executive reports to (the board, the CEO, etc.)
- The scope of duties and authority
- Whether the executive will serve on the board of directors
- Protection against material diminution of duties without consent
Unlike standard employees, executives often negotiate "good reason" resignation rights triggered by changes to their title, reporting structure, or responsibilities.
Base Salary
Executive base salaries are typically set annually and reviewed by the board's compensation committee. The agreement should specify:
- The initial base salary
- The minimum salary floor (the salary cannot be reduced below this amount without triggering good reason)
- The frequency and process for salary reviews
Annual Bonus
Executive bonuses are typically structured around target and maximum amounts:
- Target bonus — The expected bonus at 100% performance (often 30-100% of base salary for C-suite)
- Maximum bonus — The cap on bonus earnings (often 150-200% of target)
- Performance metrics — Company revenue, EBITDA, individual goals, or a combination
- Discretionary component — Whether the board retains any discretion over bonus determination
When drafting executive bonus provisions, clearly define the performance metrics, the measurement period, and the payment timeline. Ambiguity in executive bonus calculations is a common source of disputes and can result in significant financial exposure.
Equity Compensation
Equity is often the largest component of executive compensation. Executive agreements typically include:
- Initial grant — Stock options, RSUs, or restricted stock at the time of hire
- Annual refresh grants — Additional equity awards each year
- Performance-based equity — Grants that vest based on company performance milestones
- Acceleration provisions — Single or double-trigger acceleration upon change of control
- Extended exercise windows — Longer post-termination exercise periods for stock options
Signing Bonus and Relocation
Signing bonuses compensate executives for forfeited compensation at their prior employer (often called a "make-whole" payment). The agreement should address:
- The amount and payment timing
- Clawback provisions requiring repayment if the executive leaves within a specified period
- Relocation assistance including moving expenses, temporary housing, and spousal employment support
Severance and Termination
Enhanced Severance
Executive severance packages are significantly more generous than standard employee severance. Typical executive severance includes:
- 12 to 24 months of base salary (compared to a few weeks for standard employees)
- Pro-rated or full target bonus for the year of termination
- Equity acceleration — 6 to 24 months of additional vesting
- Extended COBRA coverage — 12 to 18 months of employer-paid health insurance
- Outplacement services — Executive-level career coaching and placement assistance
Definition of Cause
The definition of "cause" in executive agreements is typically more narrow and employee-friendly than in standard agreements. Common elements include:
- Conviction of a felony (not merely an indictment or charge)
- Willful and material breach of the agreement (after notice and opportunity to cure)
- Fraud or embezzlement
- Willful failure to perform material duties (after notice and opportunity to cure)
The key difference is the emphasis on "willful" misconduct and the requirement for notice and cure periods, which give the executive the opportunity to address the issue before termination.
Good Reason
Good reason provisions allow the executive to resign and receive full severance benefits if the employer takes certain actions:
- Material reduction in base salary (typically more than 10%)
- Material change in duties, authority, or reporting structure
- Relocation of the primary workplace beyond a specified distance (usually 25-50 miles)
- Material breach of the agreement by the employer
- Failure to have a successor company assume the agreement after a change of control
Good reason provisions require careful drafting. Most include a notice-and-cure mechanism: the executive must notify the employer of the good reason condition within a specified period (often 30-90 days), and the employer has a cure period (often 30 days) to remedy the condition before the executive can resign for good reason.
Change of Control Provisions
Why Change of Control Matters
When a company is acquired or merged, executive roles are often redundant or significantly altered. Change of control provisions protect executives during these transitions.
Single vs. Double Trigger
- Single trigger — Severance and acceleration are triggered by the change of control alone, regardless of whether the executive's employment is affected
- Double trigger — Benefits are triggered only if the change of control is followed by the executive's termination (without cause or for good reason) within a specified period (typically 12-24 months)
Investors and acquirers generally prefer double-trigger provisions because they encourage executives to stay through the transition.
Change of Control Benefits
Typical change-of-control benefits include:
- Full acceleration of unvested equity
- Enhanced cash severance (often 1.5 to 3 times annual compensation)
- Continuation of benefits for an extended period
- Gross-up payments for excise taxes under Section 280G (though these are becoming less common)
Section 280G
Section 280G of the Internal Revenue Code imposes a 20% excise tax on "excess parachute payments" — compensation tied to a change of control that exceeds 3 times the executive's average annual compensation over the prior 5 years. The agreement should address how 280G is handled — either through a gross-up payment (the company pays the excise tax), a cutback (payments are reduced to avoid the excise tax), or a "best of" provision (whichever approach leaves the executive with the higher after-tax amount).
Non-Compete and Restrictive Covenants
Executive non-competes are generally broader and longer than those for standard employees, reflecting the executive's deeper access to strategic information and key relationships. Common terms include:
- 12 to 24 month restriction period
- Broad competitive scope covering the company's entire business line
- Customer and employee non-solicitation provisions
- Enhanced confidentiality obligations
Because executives receive substantial severance and other benefits, courts are more likely to enforce broader restrictive covenants against them.
Indemnification and D&O Insurance
Executives often negotiate for:
- Indemnification — The company agrees to defend and indemnify the executive against claims arising from their service as an officer or director
- D&O insurance — Confirmation that the company maintains directors and officers liability insurance covering the executive
- Tail coverage — D&O insurance coverage that extends beyond the executive's departure
Best Practices
- Negotiate all material terms upfront — Do not leave significant provisions for "later discussion"
- Define cause and good reason precisely — These definitions drive the most significant financial outcomes
- Address change of control comprehensively — Including acceleration, severance, and 280G treatment
- Include indemnification and D&O coverage — Essential for any executive taking on fiduciary responsibilities
- Consider tax planning — Work with tax advisors to structure compensation tax-efficiently
- Document everything — Executive disputes involve large sums; clarity in the agreement prevents costly litigation
Executive employment agreements require more time, negotiation, and precision than standard agreements. But the investment in a well-drafted agreement pays dividends in alignment, retention, and reduced conflict throughout the executive's tenure.